When your team needs more than async projects alone, Recollective gives you one platform for asynchronous studies, live qual and insight communities. That means more flexibility, stronger participant engagement and a platform that can grow with your research.
Get a Demo
See how Microsoft used Recollective to bring more qualitative research in-house and accelerate insight delivery.
Recollective is the stronger fit when your team needs more than asynchronous research alone — especially if you want live qual, blended studies and long-term communities in one platform.
Yes. Recollective supports rich asynchronous studies, while also giving teams the flexibility to add live and blended methodologies when needed.
Qualzy can be a fit for async-led projects. Recollective is the better choice for teams that want broader methodological flexibility and a platform that can support more complex qualitative research over time.
No. Recollective supports short-term studies, live sessions and long-term communities, so teams can use one platform across a wide range of qual needs.
For many teams, yes. Recollective can reduce the need to stitch together separate tools for async work, live qual and ongoing community research.
Both Recollective and Qualzy support digital diaries and journals. Recollective is the stronger fit when diary studies need to scale beyond 200 participants or combine with live video sessions, AI-moderated interviews and follow-up discussions in the same study.
Recollective includes live video focus groups and depth interviews alongside asynchronous activities. Qualzy is built for asynchronous research and does not include live video focus groups or IDIs.
Yes. Recollective is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant and GDPR compliant, with data encryption, access controls and single sign-on (SSO) support for organizations with strict data handling requirements.